Since the early days of human subsistence, “men and women are equal” was not a claim. Men, even in those days, were expected to provide for the subsistence of every woman in his life. Additionally, in modern times, men were made legally liable to provide for the subsistence of their were wives or companions in life. Men confront the same obligation with daughters until they find a man willing to become morally, socially, and legally liable for their subsistence. As expected, deeply embbeded instincts tell men that they must inescapably find means of survival for themselves, their women, and their families.

It is obvious that men are the ones morally obligated, socially mandated, and legally forced to be responsible for other people’s subsistence. However, women are not. Women have never been ~and because they are females~ they will never be socially mandated and legally forced to be responsible for other people’s subsistence.

To help those who are the core of the human specie, nature’s architect made men to be hunters, and to think like one. Appropriately, men were designed to have the physical qualities and mental powers as well as suitable features, attributes, capabilities, skills, and a corresponding set of instincts to do a competent and capable job competing for survival with other men.

Men and women are equal just like cows and horses can swim.

Yes, cows and horses can swim. It is highly unlikely, however, that the designer of nature wanted these outstanding creatures be able to enter fish’ territories ~such as rivers, lakes, or oceans~ and compete with fish taking sources of survival away from them. It is likely, however, that cows’ and horses’ were given the ability to swim to save their lives in case of an emergency such as massive flooding; otherwise, cows and horses must remain where they belong: on land; and fish be given physical qualities as well as suitable features, attributes, capabilities, skills, and a set of instincts to do a competent and capable job competing for survival with other fish in their rightful territory.

It was in the late XX century when western women decided to invade men’s territories taking sources of survival away from those with moral, social, and legal obligations. Women were then and remain today arbitrarily acting on a verbal claim: “men and women are equal”. Ten years into the XXI century, women have not yet produced a shred of verifiable evidences to substantiate what they claim.

Should women arbitrarily and capriciously continue invading territories not intended for them ~and remain taking sources of survival away from those with mandatory obligations~ they are responsible for harmfully disturbing a natural course of life; and accountable for detrimentally affecting the subsistence of families which ~in turn~ they raise children with wrong values in anti-nature environments that believe that men and women are equal.

Altogether, families’ unity, integrity, and right to succeed as intended by an almighty  designer are seriously compromised because large numbers of women appear not be happy being human females; and so, they remain acting on a claim no one can substantiate: men and women are equal.

Since nature’s designer has well-founded reasons assigning roles to humans ~as He does with animals~ it is then up to western women to recognize that there are unwanted, undesirable, and damaging consequences when they impose on men and children the price attached to shuffling roles with those of men, replicate, and mimic what men are meant to do.

When it comes to “men and women are equal”, nature’s mastermind

took the decision a long time ago; and His decison is not negotiable.
About the Author: